7/08/2010

Small government, trickle down, and tax cuts are not the solution, they are the problem

When people talk of a grass roots movement for lower taxes and smaller government what they have in mind is something that will benefit the average family.  What they don't realize is they are being duped, used and manipulated by the wealthy, the large corporations and the movers and shakers in this world to work against their own self interest.  The report by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities points out what thirty years of Regan's, the TEA party's  and the Heritage Foundation's rhetoric of  "the government is the problem not the solution" results in.  Small government, trickle down, and tax cuts are not the solution, they are the problem, and the vast majority of the American people have been duped. In addition to economics, we can point to pollution, oil spills and the number of jobs and corporations who move off shore or overseas as the benefits of such policies. 

The gap between the wealthiest Americans and middle- and working-class Americans has more than tripled in the past three decades, according to a June 25 report by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

New data show that the gaps in after-tax income between the richest 1 percent of Americans and the middle and poorest parts of the population in 2007 was the highest it's been in 80 years, while the share of income going to the middle one-fifth of Americans shrank to its lowest level ever.

The CBPP report attributes the widening of this gap partly to Bush Administration tax cuts, which primarily benefited the wealthy. Of the $1.7 trillion in tax cuts taxpayers received through 2008, high-income households received by far the largest -- not only in amount but also as a percentage of income -- which shifted the concentration of after-tax income toward the top of the spectrum.

The average household in the top 1 percent earned $1.3 million after taxes in 2007, up $88,800 just from the prior year, while the income of the average middle-income household hovered around $55,300. While the nation's total income has grown sharply since 1979, according to the CBPP report, the wealthiest households have claimed an increasingly large share of the pie.

Arloc Sherman, a researcher for CBPP, said the income gap is expanding not because the middle class is losing income, but because the wealthiest incomes are skyrocketing.

"If income growth had been shared equally among all income groups, the families at the bottom would have $6,000 per year more than they do now, and the middle would have $13,000 more," he said.
Sherman said one key to closing the gap is a responsible tax policy.

"It would be a big step in the wrong direction to enact proposals like a big rollback in the taxes on the wealthiest estates," Sherman said. "It would probably help to enact some of the middle class tax extender proposals advanced by the President and the Democrats, including things like the extension of the expanded child tax credit."

The CBPP data do not show the effect of the recession that began in December 2007, but economists say that the recession has probably reduced the income gap only temporarily due to the severe drop in the stock market.

"Everyone, rich and poor, has been hammered in this recession," Sherman said. "But in the past, the wealthy have rebounded more easily than the middle."

article

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

  • Facebook me